Purchase access. Login

Permanenter Vergleich

Methodologische Überlegungen zu einer an der Grounded-Theory-Methodologie orientierten international vergleichenden Forschung

Kathleen Falkenberg

Cite this publication as

Kathleen Falkenberg, Marcelo Parreira do Amaral(Hg.), Sarah Lange(Hg.), Permanenter Vergleich (2018), Waxmann Verlag, 48159 Münster, ISSN: 0947-9732, 2018 #1, p.107

Tracked since 05/2018



This article discusses the benefits of employing Grounded Theory Methodology (GTM) in international comparative studies from a methodological point of view. After a short introduction to the main characteristics of GTM, the article focuses on three methodological issues concerning GTM and comparative studies: First, the question of case selection and theoretical sampling, second, the parallels of the constant comparative method and comparison as a method, and third, the concepts of tertium comparationis and core category. All three aspects are discussed in relation to a study on Swedish and German teachers’ justice beliefs regarding assessment in school. GTM, it is argued, is a tool to face well-known challenges of comparative research, such as methodological nationalism, thereby contributing to ongoing discussions about relating methodological principles of qualitative research to comparative research.

More of this issue

    Related titles

      More of this author(s)